|
Post by Mighty on Jul 7, 2015 8:36:21 GMT
It's time to give TC a beating. I, Mighty, on the behalf of Kriemhild Vanguard, declare war on The Conquerors. 3 v 3 or 5 v5, survival or simple, anything works. Waiting for challenge to be accepted.
|
|
|
Post by Alexander on Jul 7, 2015 16:03:58 GMT
5 vs 5 survival stamina. Fixed decks for each duelist, to be submitted to an agreed upon third party before the war. Decks to be revealed after the war by said party.
Losing clan members shall mandatorily wear [Pwned] or |Pwned| tags in chats for a month after the war, and the [Pwned] tag shall also be added to their forum rank. Basically, the forum rank of a TC if we lose shall become [Pwned]The Conquerors, and that of a KV shall become [Pwned]Krimheild Vanguard. Said rank would remain in effect till a month after the war ends, and admins and mods who have different ranks shall not be exempt from this.
War shall start in 10-12 days and we'll give you the lists then.
|
|
|
Post by Mighty on Jul 7, 2015 17:55:47 GMT
Since it's Survival there's no fixation on having an odd number. Make it 4 v 4 survival stamina with 1 substitute? You never know when one of the clans might face inactivity. I myself might be inactive for a few days towards the beginning of August. Just a suggestion which should benefit both parties. Rest of the conditions agreed
|
|
|
Post by Rashaskool on Jul 7, 2015 19:34:42 GMT
No to the [Pwned] bit. Two of the people participating are forum Admins and one is a Global mod, that tag undermines authority. We'll just create a win/loss record thread
|
|
|
Post by Alexander on Jul 7, 2015 20:32:58 GMT
Its a given that the admin/mod positions aren't related to dueling prowess, so no there shouldn't really be a problem at all. And who will undermine you guys' authority, really? I've yet to see any troublemakers here. Its a good, nice community.
Anyways, ok, 4 vs 4 is fine. But the Pwned tags are a necessity. Thats how wars long ago were XD. They didn't go so far as forum ranks, but unlike those days, its the forum thats more popular here, so I want those tags. Anyways, come on man... just a little something to spice things up. Take it or leave it.
|
|
|
Post by Phoenix on Jul 8, 2015 1:26:26 GMT
Pwned tags seem a bit un-sportsmanlike to me.
|
|
|
Post by the_stellar on Jul 8, 2015 9:13:11 GMT
No to the [Pwned] bit. Two of the people participating are forum Admins and one is a Global mod, that tag undermines authority. We'll just create a win/loss record thread you've got no authority in front of me, HAHA. you wanted to be in a clan,facing wars?then, you must follow the same rules.are the admins scared? p.s.:that was fun
|
|
|
Post by Rashaskool on Jul 8, 2015 9:52:53 GMT
It's not about being scared, it seems unnecessary. I wouldn't get anything out of seeing TC members wearing the tag and I still stand by what I said before.
These things require a bit of give and take, you can't make demands and expect no objections to any of them. I don't like the tags and wouldn't enforce them upon either team. I see no good reason for them to be there and as such maintain my refusal to apply them to the rules.
Take it or leave it.
Also, I'd like to point out I've been in plenty of clan wars where this "rule" that was a necessity was not in effect. They were still fun and they still happened.
|
|
|
Post by Alexander on Jul 8, 2015 12:35:59 GMT
Nothing unsportsmanlike about this, Pho. Wars are serious business. And iirc, it was your own clan that once made Grunt and his clanmates wear these very tags, yes?
And I'm sad to hear that, Rash. The offer still stands in case you change your mind.
|
|
|
Post by Phoenix on Jul 8, 2015 21:05:24 GMT
I wasn't the leader
|
|
|
Post by Mighty on Jul 21, 2015 11:28:42 GMT
War officially cancelled du to conflicting interests.
|
|